"It is going down into the abyss that you recover the treasures of life," wrote mythologist Joseph Campbell. "Where you stumble, there lies your treasure."
This quote was in my Free Will Astrology horoscope last week. It was also the week where something just flipped off (or on, maybe) in my soul and brain. It happened during Donnie Darko (not because, necessarily, but more aided by). From there on I had this feeling in my gut that I couldn't shake off. It just stayed with me the entire day and I felt extremely confused and in the "abyss" that Joseph Campbell might have been talking about. I didn't feel bad at all. I felt this emotion that I shouldn't even start trying to explain. I guess it was a mixture of melancholy, extreme love, extreme sadness and some unknown ingredient that I can't put my finger on. I was in the abyss, and I was waiting for myself to stumble.
It was about an hour and a half ago that I "stumbled". I was walking down middle field after my last class holding my PB&J and sprite in my hands, and I was thinking about the answers to the questions of life, the universe, and everything. I was thinking that the Answer must be here somewhere, because matter can not be created or destroyed. Everything connects, everything is one thing, and that one thing is the answer. This theory only works, though, if there's continuity in life. It's a phrase that's used in movies when describing how everything adds up, or makes sense. Not only is it talking about the logic of the plot, but it also means when Bob is wearing a white shirt in scene five, he needs to wear that same shirt in scene six. That sort of thing. So if everything has continuity, then my theory works.
I also felt like stuff has been happening, coincidence stuff, that has been pushing me down this path. Well, maybe not pushing necessarily, but here's an example: today in English, I was reading an article about breast milk lacking vitamin D, and someone across the room just randomly said "vitamin D" in their conversation; I was looking at the word answer earlier in the blog, and it just looked like such an odd word, and someone in the movie in my mom's room (Being John Malkovich) said "answer"; in the Weekly, I read an article about a movie about Stanley Kubrick (directed A Clockwork Orange, 2001: Space Odyssey) called Color Me Kubrick has John Malkovich in it, which I rented on Tuesday night; I'd had a discussion with my mom about summer travels yesterday night (and how I'm to young to travel by myself), and I flipped my new Seventeen Magazine to a page that said "How to talk to your parents about summer travels". I think I need an existential detective...
Excerpt From New Science Magazine:
Why we are here If retrocausality is real, it might even explain why life exists in the universe - exactly why the universe is so "finely tuned" for human habitation. Some physicists search for deeper laws to explain this fine-tuning, while others say there are millions of universes, each with different laws, so one universe could quite easily have the right laws by chance and, of course, that's the one we're in.
Paul Davies, a theoretical physicist at the Australian Centre for Astrobiology at Macquarie University in Sydney, suggests another possibility: the universe might actually be able to fine-tune itself. If you assume the laws of physics do not reside outside the physical universe, but rather are part of it, they can only be as precise as can be calculated from the total information content of the universe. The universe's information content is limited by its size, so just after the big bang, while the universe was still infinitesimally small, there may have been wiggle room, or imprecision, in the laws of nature.
And room for retrocausality. If it exists, the presence of conscious observers later in history could exert an influence on those first moments, shaping the laws of physics to be favorable for life. This may seem circular: life exists to make the universe suitable for life. If causality works both forwards and backwards, however, consistency between the past and the future is all that matters. "It offends our common-sense view of the world, but there's nothing to prevent causal influences from going both ways in time," Davies says. "If the conditions necessary for life are somehow written into the universe at the big bang, there must be some sort of two-way link." (I found this on the Donnie Darko fan site...you see what I mean about something pushing me down this path?)
That's what I believe. Riding my bike to the store today, I had the chance to think about all of this. This is basically my train of thought:
I threw my bike lock keys into my purse and I grabbed my bike and pushed off onto the street. The air was so cool against my warm face; inside our house today felt like a sauna. I started riding and the wind carried sweet scents of plumeria to my nose. The molecules in the plumeria are incredibly tiny compared to it, the plumeria itself is tiny compared to me, I am incredibly tiny compared to the Earth, and the Earth is incredibly tiny compared to the galaxy, and the galaxy is incredibly tiny compared to the universe. But maybe I was thinking about that in the wrong way. Should things like this be understood by
size? I mentally zoom up and up and up, seeing further than religions, than countries, than borders, than worlds and shapes. The mind is amazing, and maybe there are things that we don't know about it, maybe the entire universe is in, or controlled by our minds? The paths that we take, each living organism (even the phytoplankton and the trees), are so invariably linked to each other. Six degrees of separation? What about none? Our realities are so interlinked that maybe we aren't billions of people living on the same crust of a planet. Maybe we are truly one. Maybe there are millions of universes staked on top of each other. Steven Hawking's view is that the string theory landscape is populated by the set of all possible histories. Rather than a branching set of individual universes, every possible version of a single universe exists simultaneously in a state of quantum superposition. When you choose to make a measurement, you select from this landscape a subset of histories that share the specific features measured. Not by distance. The history of the universe - for you the observer - is derived from that subset of histories. In other words, you choose your past.
I believe that all of our realities are quantum superpositioned, like the universes. That there is an infinite amount choices and paths simultaneously existing together as one. This is where the divine being comes into play for me. God is omnipotent, and we are all one, so a logical conclusion is that we are all "God" or we all are divine beings that are linked in a state of togetherness.
I jump off my bike--I am at Longs. The air is filled with smoke from the BBQ going on at the farmer's market in the parking lot. I chain my bike to the metal post, jump out and head for the automatic sliding doors. I've decided to dye my hair purple.
Have a nice day, quantum superpositioned God person.